This led to the discovery, made in the s, that peppered moths do not naturally rest on tree trunks, but reside higher in the upper canopy. So where do the photos come from? They had to be staged by gluing dead specimens or manually placing live ones which are sluggish in daylight on the trunks.
Icons of Evolution
Clearly the picture is more complicated: natural selection is not demonstrated by showing moths outside of their natural hiding places, and it is inappropriate for textbooks to uncritically continue to reproduce these photos. If these and the other icons of evolution that we find in textbooks are the best evidence we have, how can we say yes? To appeal to the scientific consensus no longer carries as much weight if these icons helped to establish that consensus.
And if science is a self-correcting enterprise, why do these distortions last for so long? Returning once again to Douglas Futuyma's textbook "Evolutionary Biology", we find a remark which is not unique but is found in different words in other textbooks eg.
- ASM Handbook Volume 1: Properties and Selection: Irons, Steels, and High-Performance Alloys (06181).
- What's Related.
- Reversing Babel: Translation Among the English During an Age of Conquests, c. 800 to c. 1200.
- How Not to Go Broke at 102!: Achieving Everlasting Wealth.
- Crystal Symmetries. Shubnikov Centennial Papers.
- Question Evolution!
- Commentaries on Living: Second Series!
It was Darwin's theory of evolution But when evidence is distorted in order to further a particular worldview, science suffers. Darwinian evolution could in theory still be true, but we are not going to arrive at an answer if science is straightjacketed by the demands that it conform to a particular view of reality. Science needs to be the search for truth and to that end, the icons of evolution need to be removed from textbooks.
View all 7 comments. Garbage science. Creationist misunderstandings of evolution in book form. View all 5 comments. Jul 29, Carissa Norris rated it it was amazing. An excellent review of the evidences that are used in most standard publications that purportedly support evolutionary theory.