This led to the discovery, made in the s, that peppered moths do not naturally rest on tree trunks, but reside higher in the upper canopy. So where do the photos come from? They had to be staged by gluing dead specimens or manually placing live ones which are sluggish in daylight on the trunks.
Icons of Evolution
Clearly the picture is more complicated: natural selection is not demonstrated by showing moths outside of their natural hiding places, and it is inappropriate for textbooks to uncritically continue to reproduce these photos. If these and the other icons of evolution that we find in textbooks are the best evidence we have, how can we say yes? To appeal to the scientific consensus no longer carries as much weight if these icons helped to establish that consensus.
And if science is a self-correcting enterprise, why do these distortions last for so long? Returning once again to Douglas Futuyma's textbook "Evolutionary Biology", we find a remark which is not unique but is found in different words in other textbooks eg.
- ASM Handbook Volume 1: Properties and Selection: Irons, Steels, and High-Performance Alloys (06181).
- What's Related.
- Reversing Babel: Translation Among the English During an Age of Conquests, c. 800 to c. 1200.
- How Not to Go Broke at 102!: Achieving Everlasting Wealth.
- Crystal Symmetries. Shubnikov Centennial Papers.
- Question Evolution!
- Commentaries on Living: Second Series!
It was Darwin's theory of evolution But when evidence is distorted in order to further a particular worldview, science suffers. Darwinian evolution could in theory still be true, but we are not going to arrive at an answer if science is straightjacketed by the demands that it conform to a particular view of reality. Science needs to be the search for truth and to that end, the icons of evolution need to be removed from textbooks.
View all 7 comments. Garbage science. Creationist misunderstandings of evolution in book form. View all 5 comments. Jul 29, Carissa Norris rated it it was amazing. An excellent review of the evidences that are used in most standard publications that purportedly support evolutionary theory.
It's nice to be able to understand these "evidences" in light of critical information. Americans are rarely if ever presented with both the pros and cons of evolution and hardly ever told the full stories behind the "evidences": staged speckled moth pictures, inaccurate representations of embryos, four-winged fruit flies with extra wings that don't function, just to na An excellent review of the evidences that are used in most standard publications that purportedly support evolutionary theory.
Americans are rarely if ever presented with both the pros and cons of evolution and hardly ever told the full stories behind the "evidences": staged speckled moth pictures, inaccurate representations of embryos, four-winged fruit flies with extra wings that don't function, just to name a few. I am so glad I stumbled upon this book and now have a more critical view of the standard evolutionary icons. It bothers me that neo-Darwinian evolution has become dogmatism in America. In many European countries, scientists are free to follow the evidence where it leads, but in America, scientists risk being labeled as creationists even if they aren't and may be fired or denied grants if they dare to challenge evolution.
I, for one, am glad that there are books like this that are willing to tackle the weaknesses of evolution, especially in a society where we are largely discouraged from this kind of pursuit.
Feb 20, Mike Trapp rated it it was amazing. This book was eye opening and thought provoking. Despite vehement denials from the pro-Darwin crowd, there are significant unanswered questions about the theory of evolution. The evidence presented in this book is that the Darwinists have not really proven their case on a scientific basis. It would seem that the evidence is being propped up by a sort of fanatic devotion to a preconceived conclusion.
5 Ways to Help Your Child Deal With Evolution
For years I had heard that "the data are overwhelming" and that there was a scientific consensus - This book was eye opening and thought provoking. For years I had heard that "the data are overwhelming" and that there was a scientific consensus - that evolution was indisputable. This book changed my mind. Jonathon Wells has been pilloried in the scientific community because of his religion.
- Navigation menu!
- Fundamental Aspects of Nuclear Reactor Fuel Elements (Tid 26711 P1)!
- Opportunities in gerontology and aging services careers?
- Graham Greenes Narrative Strategies: A Study of the Major Novels!
- Image Politics: The New Rhetoric of Environmental Activism?
- Alchemically Purified and Solidified Mercury.
The prejudice is that a "creationist" as scientists like to paint him, cannot possibly be objective in his conclusions. They even claim that anyone who has a religion just doesn't have the scientific rigor to draw any adequate conclusions. This is utterly and blatantly false and ignores the fact that there are even atheists who refute the Darwinian mechanism.
Jonathon takes 10 icons of evolution, such as homologous structures, the fossil record, the Cambrian explosion and others, and show how the evidence has been gerrymandered into supporting Darwin's theory. This is a rebuke of so-called scientific objectivism and you will no doubt encounter stiff resistance as you discuss this book with others who have bought the propoganda. Nevertheless, you cannot find the truth by ignoring the evidence or stretching it to mean something that it doesn't.
I heartily recommend this book. Jan 06, Chris rated it did not like it Shelves: do-not-recommend. How do I Ugh, I want my evening back. I picked this up after seeing it being highly rated here and also used as a talking point in a documentary I was watching on Netflix.
Thought I'd give it a chance. I'd like to believe I'm someone who doesn't get angry often, if ever, but this book made me visibly angry. How do people reading this believe it? In an age of information, to be so capable of ignorance so as to believe this drivel is maddening! Examples like Haeckel's embryos aren't even taught anym How do I Examples like Haeckel's embryos aren't even taught anymore because it was found to be wrong. No current text book in decades has ever used it. For those of you arguing that it's proof of evolution to be wrong it's proof that someone got something wrong and it was fixed.
And the use of the word evidence!
See a Problem?
Goodness, people who endorse this book don't seem to know what the word means! When this book talks of Darwin's Finches, no scientific citation is done. It is just wide speculation and opinion. This does not make for a good argument, this makes for the appearance of someone standing on a box shouting. I'm done with this book. If you are reading this and wondering whether or not to pick up a copy, stop. Don't even touch it. You'll be wasting your time along with filling your head with misinformation.
View all 3 comments. Jul 10, Laurie rated it it was amazing. Since evolution is a theory, why are we not allowed to question it and debate it? Why is it taught as the gospel truth? Why is Darwin's theory the only theory allowed to be taught in school? Interesting reading if one wishes to look at the information being taught. Nov 26, Andrew Hill rated it did not like it Shelves: stopped-reading.
Aug 10, Charles rated it did not like it Shelves: nonfic-religion. I hesitate to put this in non-fiction actually, because so much of it is just made up. Personally, as a Christian and a scientist both, I find it horrifying that a supposed Christian could tell so many half truths and outright lies. Wells had an agenda for this book, and it didn't include being honest and open about the concept of evolution. He should be ashamed of himself. View 1 comment. Nov 18, Rasheed rated it it was amazing Shelves: darwinism , evolution.
May 20, Luke rated it really liked it. When most people think of Darwinism, they think of his Tree of Life, or drawings of similar looking embryos, or the creation of living molecules through replication of Earth's early environment in a laboratory, or the series of drawings showing an ape slowly developing into a fully formed human male. These images and icons are nearl "Icons of Evolution" is a excellent primer for people who may not have heard of the inconsistencies and problems with many of Darwinian Evolution's primary "proofs".
These images and icons are nearly synonymous with Darwinian Evolution, and have been among the primary arguments advanced by Darwinists since the late 19th century. In "Icons of Evolution: Science or Myth? He also takes time to evaluate some of the top biology textbooks, in regards to their accuracy on these topics. He presents a very compelling case that not a single one of these icons is deserving of its iconic status. In some cases, these icons have been dismissed decades ago by the scientific community but are still being taught as truth in textbooks.
Wells has done an enormous amount of research and reading for this book and all of his references and suggestions for further reading are listed in the back of the book. He quotes experts from nearly every field of natural science imaginable and builds his arguments by sampling liberally from other scientists who have expressed similar concerns.